HOME |  BACK |  NEXT |  _  WORDLIST |  TOPICS |  _  AUTHORS |  E-MAIL |  _  INDEX | -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

WWWE Logo Standard

A standard is an essential part of the international computer and communications field. There are standards for nearly every aspect of computing and communication, and it doesn't take much reflection to realize how essential these are to the success of the WWW. It was the need to transfer documents across different platforms that led to the development of SGML, Standard Generalized Markup Language. Without standards and established protocols, network communication could not exist on the scale that it exists today.

URLs:

Computer and Communication Standards Documentation
This site has links to standards organizations from all over the world which pertain to computers and communications.
IETF (Internet Engineering Task Force)
The site of the Internet Engineering Task Force explains the difference between an Internet RFC and a standard, and the criteria used by the IETF to determine whether a set of specifications are eligible to become a proposed standard, a draft standard, or an actual standard. This is a fascinating site with many interesting links to standards.

W3E References:

ISO (International Organization for Standardization
IETF (Internet Engineering Task Force)
specification

Detail:

The proceedings of the IETF as they supervise the acceptance of Requests for Comments, and Internet Drafts, help illuminate the steps that are taken by standards organizations. Like cottage cheese, Internet Drafts have a shelf-life; they either become Requests for Comments (RFC), possibly on the road to becoming a standard, or they expire of old age at the age of six months. An RFC is either a "proposed standard," or it is "historic," "experimental," or "informational." Proposed standards can remain at that status for two years, at which point they will either be "elevated, depreciated, or recycled." A draft standard also has a two-year window of opportunity within which it may be advanced to standard status, sent back to proposed, or recycled. A genuine standard has proven its stability and will be around indefinitely, unless the changing network makes it obsolete, at which point it would become a standard of only historic interest. Should a standard become historic, it would be replaced by another standard, created from scratch, which would have to start at the proposed level.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

E-Mail: The World Wide Web Encyclopedia at wwwe@tab.com
E-Mail: Charles River Media at chrivmedia@aol.com
Copyright 1996 Charles River Media. All rights reserved.
Text - Copyright © 1995, 1996 - James Michael Stewart & Ed Tittel.
Web Layout - Copyright © 1995, 1996 - LANWrights & IMPACT Online.
Revised -- February 20th, 1996